Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 00:18
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
The High Stakes of Kevin Durant’s Closing Act - The Ringer
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Why didn't Taylor Swift do Taylor Swift (Taylors version)?
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Browns' quarterback competition is right where it's supposed to be | The Huddle - Cleveland Browns
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Is it painful for men to wear bras, panties, and tampons?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Is it safe to say that China is at least 30 years ahead of India?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
High-Average, Low-Slugging Hitters Are Back, and Baseball Is Better for It - Sports Illustrated
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Steelers' T.J. Watt Reportedly Won't Attend Minicamp Amid Desire for New Contract - Bleacher Report
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.